Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2606.04387 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]

Title:Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking

Authors:Chenyu Zhang, Yiwen Liu, Yin Sun, Xinyuan Zhang, Yuji Cao, Junming Jiao, Juyi Qiao
View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking, by Chenyu Zhang and 6 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Sales lead conversion in high-stakes domains (e.g., automotive, real estate) differs fundamentally from e-commerce recommendation due to prolonged decision cycles and multi-stage funnels. Traditional lead scoring methods rule-based scorecards, machine learning, or pointwise CTR models face severe challenges: sparse supervision, a semantic gap in unstructured CRM logs, and inability to capture relative lead priority. While Large Language Models(LLMs) offer superior semantic understanding of customer interactions, general-purpose LLMs are ill-suited for lead ranking: they generate text rather than comparable scores, and lack alignment with the hierarchical priorities of sales funnels. We introduce an LLM-based discriminative framework for sales lead scoring, which supports joint modeling of structured CRM features and unstructured customer interactions. On top of this framework, we propose HPRO (Hierarchical Preference Ranking Optimization), which augments sales lead scoring with a hierarchical preference ranking objective. HPRO employs a margin-aware Bradley-Terry formulation to transform sparse binary labels into dense, funnel-aware preference pairs, enabling lead scoring to leverage both pointwise and pairwise supervision. Experiments on large-scale data from a leading NEV brand demonstrate state-of-the-art classification (AUC 0.8161) and ranking performance (+39.7% precision among top-ranked leads). A 132-day online A/B test validates 9.5% sales volume uplift, confirming real-world commercial impact.
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04387 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2606.04387v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04387
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Chenyu Zhang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 03:05:57 UTC (360 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking, by Chenyu Zhang and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
view license

Additional Features

  • Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-06
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences